Skip to content
0xbenzo
Back to writing
5 min read

vLLM: A Modern Inference Engine for Large Language Models

An exploration of how vLLM serving is optimized using Continuous Batching and PagedAttention.

Training a Large Language Model (LLM) is only half the challenge. The other half is serving the model efficiently to thousands or even millions of users.

Traditional inference systems often struggle with GPU memory utilization, request scheduling, and concurrent user handling. vLLM was designed specifically to solve these problems.

Rather than being another framework for running models, vLLM is a production-grade inference engine optimized for maximum throughput and low latency.


Traditional LLM Inference

A traditional inference server generally follows this workflow:

User Request


Inference Server


Load Model


Generate Response


Return Output

This works well for a single user, but problems begin when hundreds of users connect simultaneously.

For example:

User A ───────────────► GPU

User B (Waiting...)

User C (Waiting...)

User D (Waiting...)

The GPU spends a significant amount of time waiting between requests, resulting in:

  • Poor GPU utilization
  • Increased response latency
  • Low throughput
  • Higher infrastructure costs

How vLLM is Different

Instead of treating each request independently, vLLM schedules multiple requests together.

                Scheduler

User A ─┐
User B ─┼───────────────┐
User C ─┤               │
User D ─┘               ▼
                  Continuous Batch


                      GPU


                 Individual Responses

The GPU remains continuously busy instead of alternating between active and idle states.

Result:

  • Higher throughput
  • Better GPU utilization
  • Lower latency
  • More concurrent users

Continuous Batching

One of the biggest innovations in vLLM is Continuous Batching.

Traditional Batch Processing

Batch

A
B
C



Process



Wait until ALL finish



Create New Batch

If B finishes early, the GPU still waits for A and C.


Continuous Batching in vLLM

Time 1

A
B
C



B finishes



A
C
D



C finishes



A
D
E

New requests are inserted immediately without waiting for the entire batch to complete.

Benefits

  • Better GPU utilization
  • Lower waiting time
  • Higher request throughput

Efficient KV Cache Management

Every generated token requires information from previous tokens.

Instead of recomputing everything, LLMs store intermediate values known as the Key-Value (KV) Cache.

Traditional systems often allocate one large memory block for each request:

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

BBBBBBBBBBBBBB

CCCCCCCCCCCCCC

When requests finish:

AAAAAAA_______

BBBBBBBBBBBBBB

______CCCCCCCC

Memory becomes fragmented.


PagedAttention

vLLM introduces PagedAttention, inspired by virtual memory in operating systems.

Instead of allocating one continuous block, memory is divided into fixed-size pages.

Page 1

Page 2

Page 3

Page 4

Page 5

Page 6

A request simply references the pages it needs.

Request A

Page 1
Page 3
Page 6

Request B

Page 2
Page 5

When a request finishes, its pages are immediately available for reuse.

Advantages

  • Minimal fragmentation
  • Better memory utilization
  • More concurrent requests
  • Larger context windows

Traditional Scheduler vs vLLM Scheduler

Traditional

Request Queue

A

B

C

D



GPU



A completes



GPU



B starts

Only one request progresses at a time.


vLLM

Incoming Requests

A
B
C
D
E
F



Dynamic Scheduler



GPU



A token
B token
C token
D token



Next iteration

A token
C token
E token
F token

Every active request advances together, one token at a time.


OpenAI-Compatible API

Another major advantage is that vLLM exposes an OpenAI-compatible REST API.

Applications written for the OpenAI API can often switch to a self-hosted vLLM deployment by changing only the API endpoint.

Application





OpenAI SDK





vLLM Server





Llama
Qwen
Gemma
DeepSeek
Mistral

This makes migration from cloud-hosted models to self-hosted infrastructure straightforward.


Comparison

Feature Traditional Inference vLLM
Request Scheduling Sequential or static batching Continuous batching
GPU Utilization Moderate Very High
Memory Management Contiguous KV cache PagedAttention
Memory Fragmentation High Very Low
Concurrent Users Limited Excellent
Throughput Moderate High
API Compatibility Varies OpenAI Compatible
Multi-GPU Support Limited Built-in

Typical Production Architecture

                    Users

        Chatbots • APIs • Agents




          Load Balancer




        OpenAI-Compatible API




          vLLM Scheduler

      ┌──────────┴──────────┐
      │                     │
      ▼                     ▼

   GPU Server 1         GPU Server 2

      │                     │
      └──────────┬──────────┘


        Large Language Model

When Should You Use vLLM?

vLLM is an excellent choice when:

  • You need to serve multiple users concurrently.
  • You want maximum GPU utilization.
  • You’re deploying LLMs in production.
  • You need OpenAI API compatibility.
  • You’re building AI chatbots, coding assistants, RAG systems, or enterprise AI platforms.

For quick local experimentation, lightweight tools such as Ollama are often sufficient. However, when scalability, throughput, and efficient resource usage become priorities, vLLM is the preferred inference engine.


Conclusion

vLLM has become one of the most important technologies in the open-source LLM ecosystem because it addresses the core challenges of production inference. Its Continuous Batching scheduler keeps GPUs busy with dynamic workloads, while PagedAttention dramatically improves KV cache memory efficiency.

Together, these innovations allow organizations to serve more users with lower latency and reduced infrastructure costs. Whether you’re building an AI chatbot, a coding assistant, or a large-scale enterprise platform, vLLM provides the performance, scalability, and flexibility needed to deploy modern Large Language Models efficiently.